Instructions:
Create a new post for your portfolio paragraph.
Monday, October 20, 2014
Money & treasure show TMOV sexism
In The Merchant of Venice, Shakespeare
repeatedly associates female characters with items of treasure to emphasize the
viewpoint that women are merely possessions. When justifying why he thinks the
gold box holds Portia’s portrait, the Prince of Morocco reasons that “never so
rich a gem/Was set in worse than gold.” (2.7.54-55). In referring to Portia as
a “gem” in this metaphor, he dehumanizes her and makes her simply a piece of
property that is good for only money and beauty. While he seems to be
complimenting her, his choice of the word “rich” also calls into question his
motivations for the marriage, suggesting that he really only wants Portia for
her wealth and status. Another suitor, the Prince of Arragon, calls the silver
box a “silver treasure-house” when he believes that it is the box with Portia’s
portrait inside (2.9.33). By saying that the box contains a “treasure,” the
Prince hints that Portia, as a wife, is a “treasure.” Although he is not
necessarily interested in her for the money, he still treats her as more of a
prize than a person, reinforcing the idea that women are objects and really
only valuable as political, bargaining tools. However, Shakespeare shows that it
is not only potential wives who are objectified. Solanio recounts how Shylock
also relates his daughter Jessica to coins, saying, “My daughter! O my ducats!
O my daughter!/Fled with a Christian! O my Christian ducats!” (2.8.15-16).
While Shylock is understandably angry about both the loss of his daughter and
the loss of his ducats, he has trouble separating the two problems from each
other, going back and forth between “daughter” and “ducats” and even
transitioning from “Fled with a Christian” to “Christian ducats.” Since Shylock
cannot distinguish which situation he is more upset about and uses very similar
sentence structure for each outburst, Shakespeare implies that Shylock
considers his daughter to be on the same level of value as the money stolen.
Just like the stolen money, Shylock considers her to be his property and his
possession to use and manipulate as he sees fit. By using the motif of money
and treasure, Shakespeare calls attention to the unfair attitude of women as
objects, as well as how that type of thinking justifies the lack of female
power in Venetian, and by extension, Elizabethan society.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I'll take this one
ReplyDeleteFirst off, I really liked the word choice of this paragraph. The word choice allowed the tome of the essay to remain the same throughout the paragraph. I especially liked how you used the word "merely" in your thesis, then followed up that Shakespeare dehumanizes women in the play. This beginning of the paragraph allowed for the rest of the essay to be based on showing how Shakespeare degrades the women.
DeleteIn addition to the quotes used in this paragraph, you could have also used the quote from the beginning of scene 2, act 7: "This first of gold...choose the right?" (2.7.4-10). In this quote, Shakespeare continues to materialize women by comparing the caskets to different traits that women may supply to a man. These traits could be thought of as "riches and desires" or a burden. Shakespeare introduces the gold and silver caskets as "desire" and "what a man deserves", respectively. Each casket relates to a quality that represents each kind of woman rather than the woman as a whole. This limitation bestowed on a wife makes the woman seem more like a possession that could only be seen as a single thing rather than a person with many qualities.