Instructions:

Create a new post for your portfolio paragraph.

Monday, November 3, 2014

Shylock Animal Metaphors No Mercy

Alex Laubscher
Merchant of Venice Portfolio B

In order to justify holding up the bond, in which he will take a pound of Antonio’s flesh, Shylock uses metaphors with animals; Shakespeare reveals Shylock’s escalation into a merciless person, rooting from his desire for revenge upon the Christians for mistreating him. After entering, he addresses the Duke of Venice saying, “Is it answered? / What if my house be troubled with a rat / And I pleased to give ten thousand ducats to have it baned?” (4.1.42-45) Shylock compares his decision to go through with his loan with Antonio to paying ten thousand ducats to kill a rat, in order to show that he feels that his decision should not be questioned. By asking, “Is it answered?,” he is saying that he does not need a reason to do as he pleases with his money, and the same goes for his loan. It should not be questioned why he would want to take the flesh of the Christian rat, Antonio, who has caused him great troubles in lieu of receiving a great sum of money, for it is his monetary decision. Shakespeare uses Shylock’s decisiveness to highlight his mercilessness and lack of pity for Antonio because he is set on getting revenge on the Christian. Later on, Shylock continues to try to validate his decision by saying, “You have among you many a purchased slave / … like your asses and your dogs and mules, / …You will answer / ‘The slaves are ours’. So do I answer you / The pound of flesh which I demand of him is dearly bought: ‘tis mine, and I will have it” (4.1.89-90, 97-99). Shylock states that “you,” Antonio, Bassanio, and the Duke of Venice, have slaves and dehumanize them by treating them like animals. However, they find justification in the fact that the slaves are theirs because the bought them. Because of Shylock’s bond with Antonio, he owns that pound of flesh which is still on Antonio and says that it would be hypocritical of the Christians to stop him from taking the pound of flesh which he rightfully owns, even if it causes a great deal of pain for Antonio. Shylock is no longer posing questions justify his decision; he is demanding that he gets his pound of flesh from Antonio, showing his now aggressive approach to reasoning his decision. Shakespeare uses Shylock’s intensifying metaphors and dialogue to exhibit Shylock’s escalation into a ruthless man determined to get revenge on Antonio as a release of his anger towards Christian people for taking his daughter and money.

2 comments:

  1. I think you did a very good job finding evidence to support your claim, your transitions are very smooth and your analysis is strong. Your idea is really good and it is something that a lot of people wouldn't notice. After reading your portfolio, I do agree that Shylock is using metaphors (many of which relate to animals) in order to further his argument for his bond. Bassanio is curious to know if Shylock would kill everything he hates. Shylock then asks Antonio and Bassanio whether they would "have a serpent sting [them] twice" (4.1, 68). Shylock is comparing himself to a "serpent," he just wants this bond, and rightfully so. Shylock is very determined to get at least this bond because he has seemingly lost everything else, including his daughter and his late wife's ring.

    ReplyDelete